: Reducing "max edge length" or increasing "max refine steps" for complex structures. Material Modeling : Checking the multi-coefficient model fit
The forum is also an indispensable resource for bridging the gap between simulation and fabrication. While Lumerical provides the solvers, the application of these tools to real-world foundry processes—such as silicon photonics or InP platforms—often requires custom scripts and workflows. The forum hosts a wealth of user-generated content, including scripting examples for automation, Python API integrations, and CML (Compact Model Library) generation techniques. This exchange of code accelerates the design cycle, moving the industry forward by preventing engineers from "reinventing the wheel" for routine tasks like lumerical forum
The Lumerical Forum is a powerful resource for researchers, scientists, and engineers working in the fields of photonics, electromagnetics, and numerical analysis. By engaging with the forum, users can tap into a collective knowledge base, get help from experts, and stay up-to-date with the latest developments in Lumerical software. Whether you're a seasoned user or new to Lumerical software, the forum offers a wealth of information, resources, and community support to help you achieve your goals. So, join the conversation, ask questions, share your experiences, and unlock the full potential of Lumerical software! : Reducing "max edge length" or increasing "max
(1-2 sentences) What I did: (steps, script snippet, or screenshot of object tree) What happened vs. expected: (e.g., divergence at 1000 fs vs. steady decay) Error message (if any): (copy-paste full text) Attachments: .lsf script, .fsp/.ldev file (zip first, max 10 MB) The forum hosts a wealth of user-generated content,
My structure consists of a 2D array of air holes in a silicon background, with a lattice constant of 500 nm. I'm using a Gaussian source with a wavelength range of 1500-1600 nm. I've meshed the structure with a maximum mesh size of 20 nm.